Too many search results, please specify search term
Verifications
Fatigue life by nominal stress method
In this article, verification examples are presented for the Fatigue analysis type in IDEA StatiCa Connection. Verification The numerical calculation CBFEM is verified on analytical and numerical FEM models according to the stress range and fatigue endurance; see examples were prepared by Kirill Golubiatnikov at Czech Technical University in Prague .
Steel
Connection
EN (Eurocode)
Fatigue
Verifications
SCI Publications P358 and P398 - Design examples
We used some of these examples in the webinar broadcast to coincide with the release - now we have decided to post them here. In the zip file there are several examples - all but one are taken from P358 - and cover the new horizontal tying analysis method. These examples are provided as is and solely for your use to compare the design examples contained within the green books with the results obtained form
Steel
Connection
EN (Eurocode)
Horizontal tying
Verifications
Verification study: Shear connections with coped beams (AISC)
Denavit and Rick Mulholland prepared this verification example in a joint project of The University of Tennessee and IDEA StatiCa. Effect of Cope Length (All-Bolted Double Angle Connection) The configuration of this example matches that of Example II.A-4 of the AISC Design Examples Steel Construction Manual Design Examples, v15.1. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois. Dowswell, B. (2018).
Steel
Connection
Buckling
Verifications
CBFEM Weld Model: Validation and Verification
Verification Comparison to EN 1993-1-8 The presented model for CBFEM is verified on a fillet weld in a lap joint and weld to unstiffened flange with analytical Figure 3: Configurations for sensitivity study, with a transverse weld, with a longitudinal weld and combination of both (not shown) Figure 4: Verification 5: Studied fillet weld connections of a flexible plate to a) an unstiffened column flange of open section and b) an unstiffened box section Figure 6: Verification
Steel
AISC (USA)
CSA (Canada)
EN (Eurocode)
Connection
Welds
CBFEM
Verifications
Verification of IDEA StatiCa calculations for steel connection design (AISC)
Six additional models were developed for verification purposes by modifying the parameters based on the available test specimens. Measured experimental response was available for the connection specimens selected for verification purposes in this study.
Steel
Connection
AISC (USA)
Bolts
Plates
Rotational stiffness
Welds
Verifications
CBFEM Book Navigation Article
Verification of resistance An overview of the considered examples and the material properties is provided in Tab. 4.1.1. Results of verification are shown in Tables 5.6.3 and 5.6.4 and in Fig. 5.6.5. , Fig. 5.6.7. Table 5.6.1 Examples overview. Tab. 7.4.1 Examples of joints loaded by axial force Tab. 7.4.2 Examples of joints loaded by in-plane moment Verification of resistance The study was focused
Steel
Connection
EN (Eurocode)
Verifications
Rectangular hollow sections
The chapter is focused on verification of joints of rectangular hollow sections. Outside the range of validity of FMM, an experiment should be prepared for validation or verification performed for verification according to a validated Tab. 7.2.2 Examples overview Example Chord Brace Angles Material Section Section θ 1 f y f u E [°] [MPa] [MPa] [MPa] 1 SHS200/6.3 SHS90/8.0 90
Steel
EN (Eurocode)
CBFEM
Welds
Connection
Verifications
Circular hollow sections
The chapter is focused on verification of connections of circular hollow sections. Outside the range of validity of FMM, an experiment should be prepared for validation or verification performed for verification according to a validated Tab. 7.1.3 Examples overview Example Chord Brace Angles Material Section Section \(\theta\) f y f u E [°] [MPa] [MPa] [GPa] 1 CHS219.1/5.0 CHS48.3
Steel
EN (Eurocode)
CBFEM
Welds
Verification book
Connection
Verifications
Uniplanar T-joint between RHS brace and H/I chord
The chapter is focused on verification of connection of plate to circular hollow section. An overview of the considered examples loaded by bending moment is described in Tab. 7.4.2. Tab. 7.4.1 Examples of joints loaded by axial force Tab. 7.4.2 Examples of joints loaded by in-plane moment Verification of resistance The study was focused
Steel
EN (Eurocode)
CBFEM
Welds
Connection
Verifications
All welded double-angle connection (AISC)
This verification example takes a connection from AISC Design examples (Version 14.2, revised in April 2016) and compares the results with values obtained Here we focus on example II.A 3 of the AISC Design examples which is All welded double-angle connection. LRFD: Vz = −228 kN at position 7.5 in ASD: Vz = −158 kN at position 7.5 in Procedure: The example is taken from AISC Design examples (Version 14.2, revised
Steel
AISC (USA)
CBFEM
Welds
Connection
Verifications
Plate to circular hollow section
Outside the range of validity of FMM, an experiment should be prepared for validation or verification performed for verification according to a validated Uniplanar plate T-joint An overview of the considered examples in the study is given in the Tab. 7.3.4. Tab. 7.3.4 Examples overview Verification The results of resistance and design failure mode of the FMM are compared with the results of CBFEM in Tab. 7.3.5
Steel
EN (Eurocode)
CBFEM
Welds
Connection
Verifications
Fillet weld in beam to column joint
The chapter is focused on verification of welds. Overview of the considered examples and the material are given in the Tab. 4.4.1. A geometry of the joint with dimensions is shown in Fig. 4.4.1. Verification of resistance Design resistance calculated by CBFEM Idea RS software is compared with the results of CM.
Steel
Connection
EN (Eurocode)
CBFEM
Stress/strain
Verification book
Not exactly matching, but you might find helpful
Verifications
Fire temperature verification of a stiffening plate
Ignorance of this aspect can result in misleading outcomes compared to manual verification.
Steel
EN (Eurocode)
Connection
CBFEM
Verifications
Fillet weld in angle plate joint
The chapter is focused on verification of welds. Overview of considered examples and material is given in Tab. 4.2.1. The geometry of the joints with dimensions is shown in Fig. 4.2.1. Verification of resistance The weld design resistances calculated by CBFEM are compared with the results of CM; see Tab. 4.2.2.
Steel
EN (Eurocode)
CBFEM
Welds
Connection
Verifications
Fillet weld in lap joint
The chapter is focused on the verification of welds. This chapter was slightly modified for this web, and the results were updated. Description The objective of this chapter is the verification of the component-based finite element method (CBFEM) of a fillet weld in a lap joint with Verification of resistance An overview of the considered examples and the material properties is provided in Tab. 4.1.1.
Steel
EN (Eurocode)
Welds
Connection
Verifications
Brace Connection at beam-column connection in a braced frame (AISC)
This is a third verification example from a series of brace connections. Verification of resistance The example uses the sections and dimensions shown in Figures 1 and 2 and as follows. Examples of these two cases are shown in Figures 6, 7 and 8.
Steel
Connection
AISC (USA)
Bolts
Welds
Verifications
Bracket Plate Connections (AISC)
This verification example was prepared by Mark D. The properties of the bolt group match those of Example II.A-24 of the AISC Design Examples (2017). The properties of the weld group match those of Example II.A-26 of the AISC Design Examples (2017).
Steel
Connection
Bolts
Moment Connection
Welds
AISC (USA)
Verifications
T-stub connections (AISC)
This verification example was prepared by Mark D. The configuration of this example matches that of Example J.5 of the AISC Design Examples v15.1 (AISC, 2019). Steel Construction Manual Design Examples, v15.1. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois. Dowswell, B. (2011).
Steel
Connection
Bolts
Plates
AISC (USA)
Verifications
Comparative Analysis of CHS Connection Resistance: CBFEM vs Design Codes (EN, FprEN, and AISC)
Verification examples: Component-based finite element design of steel connections: book chapter CHS Component-based finite element design of steel connections
Steel
EN (Eurocode)
CBFEM
Connection
HSS
AISC (USA)
Verifications
Fire design: Bolted lap joint
The object of this study is verification of component-based finite element method (CBFEM) of a bolted lap joint in fire with analytical model in Eurocode The design bearing resistance of bolts in fire should be determined from: Verification of resistance Design resistances calculated by CBFEM were compared Fig. 6 Benchmark example of the bolted splices in shear For other verification studies, visit our Support Center - Verifications .
Steel
Bolts
Fire resistance
Connection
Verifications
Multi level member and connection design
This article describes the advanced design of joints and their validation and verification is shown. This contribution shows the advanced design of joints and their Validation and Verification and how the member design including joints will be treated
Steel
Connection
Member
EN (Eurocode)
Verifications
Compressed Stiffeners in Structural Connections
It is proposed to use the reduced stress method for verification of gusset plate and haunch. The verification shows good results and will be validated on planned experiments of stiffeners with
different types of support.
Steel
Connection
AISC (USA)
Buckling
Stiffness
EN (Eurocode)
Verifications
Design of stiffeners in structural steel joints
The verification is shown on an example of a web stiffener in the welded portal frame joint. The verification is shown on an example of a web stiffener in the welded portal frame joint.
Steel
Connection
Buckling
CBFEM
Verifications
Bolts and Compressed Plates Modelling
The verification example shows that compressed plates could be in finite element models designed without applying imperfections. An essential part of the following research is verification of the buckling curve for non-regular plate shapes such as triangular.
Steel
Connection
AISC (USA)
CBFEM
Bolts
Buckling
EN (Eurocode)
Verifications
Simple and Advanced Models for Connection Design in Steel Structures
The internal part of the design procedure is validation and verification including its hierarchy. The internal part of this design procedure is validation and verification including its hierarchy.
Steel
Connection
AISC (USA)
CBFEM
EN (Eurocode)
Verifications
Chevron Brace Connection in a braced frame (AISC)
This is a second verification example from a series of brace connections. This verification example was prepared by Mahamid Mustafa in a joint project of The University of Illinois in Chicago and IDEA StatiCa. Verification of resistance The example uses the sections and dimensions shown in Figure 1 and as follows. Braces are HSS8x8x1/2 (ASTM A500 Gr.
Steel
Connection
AISC (USA)
Welds
Verifications
Bolted connection - T-stub in tension
The chapter is focused on verification of bolts. Description The objective of this chapter is verification of component-based finite element method (CBFEM) of T-stubs connected with two bolts loaded in Tab. 5.1.2 Global behavior overview Verification of resistance Design resistances calculated by CBFEM were compared with the results of CM and RM in the
Steel
EN (Eurocode)
CBFEM
Bolts
Connection
Verifications
Block Shear Rupture in Bolted Connections (AISC)
Denavit and Rick Mulholland prepared this verification example in a joint project of The University of Tennessee and IDEA StatiCa. This study focuses on bolted connections of plates in tension and coped beams as shown in the examples in Figure 1. Figure 1 Examples of block shear rupture Requirements for Block Shear Rupture in the AISC Specification The design strength, \(\phi R_n\), for the limit
Steel
Bolts
Plates
Shear connection
Connection
AISC (USA)
CSA (Canada)
Verifications
Fire design: Welded lap joint
Verification Tab. 1: Transverse fillet welds Transverse fillet welds Parametric study of temperature for transverse weld Fig. 2: Parametric study of temperature Design resistance in tension F Rd = 48 kN Benchmark example for the welded lap joint Fig. 8: Benchmark example for the welded lap joint For other verification
Steel
Fire resistance
Welds
Verifications
Advanced procedures for design of bolted connections
The last chapter presents the advantages of procedure on examples of various bridge connection, which design was supported by CBFEM.
Steel
Connection
AISC (USA)
EN (Eurocode)
CBFEM
Bolts