CBFEM method combines advantages of the general Finite Element Method (FEM) and standard Component Method (CM). The stresses and internal forces calculated on the accurate CBFEM model are used in checks of all components.

Individual components are checked according to Eurocode EN 1993-1-8.

## Design check of plates according to Eurocode

The resulting equivalent stress (Huber-Mises-Hencky – HMH, von Mises) and plastic strain are calculated on plates. Elasto-plastic material model is used for steel plates. A check of an equivalent plastic strain is performed. The limiting value of 5 % is suggested in Eurocode (EN 1993-1-5, app. C, par. C8, note 1), this value can be modified by the user in Code setup.

Plate element is divided into 5 layers and elastic/plastic behavior is investigated in each layer separately. Output summary lists the most critical check from all 5 layers.

CBFEM method can provide stress rather higher than the yield strength. The reason is the slight inclination of the plastic branch of the stress-strain diagram which is used in the analysis to improve the stability of interaction calculation. This is not a problem for practical design. At higher loads, the equivalent plastic strain is rising and the joint fails while exceeding the plastic strain limit.

## Check of welds according to Eurocode

Fillet welds are checked according to EN 1993-1-8. The strength of butt welds is assumed the same as the base metal and is not checked.

#### Fillet welds

**Design resistance**

The plastic redistribution in welds is used to automatically avoid the stress singularities in weld elements, to redistribute the stress further along the weld length. The strength of the weld approximately matches the hand calculation and the stress is correctly distributed for complicated issues like welding to unstiffened flange (EN 1993-1-8 – Cl. 4.10). The stress in the throat section of a fillet weld is determined according to EN 1993-1-8 Cl. 4.5.3. Stresses are calculated from the stresses in weld element. Bending moment around the weld longitudinal axis is not taken into account.

\[ \sigma_{w,Ed}=\sqrt{\sigma_{\perp}^2 + 3 \left ( \tau_{\perp}^2 + \tau_{\parallel}^2 \right )} \]

\[ \sigma_{w,Rd} = \frac{f_u}{\beta_w \gamma_{M2}} \]

**Weld utilization**

\[ U_t = \min \left\{ \frac{\sigma_{{w,Ed}}}{\sigma_{w,Rd}}, \frac{\sigma_{\perp}}{0.9 f_u / {\gamma_{M2}}} \right\} \]

where:

*σ*_{w,Ed}– equivalent stress in the weld*σ*_{w,Rd}– weld resistance*β*_{w}– correlation factor (EN 1993-1-8 – Table 4.1)*f*_{u}– ultimate strength, chosen as the lower of the two connected base materials or according to material chosen by user*γ*_{M2}– safety factor (EN 1993-1-8 – Table 2.1; editable in Code setup)*σ*_{┴},*τ*_{┴},*τ*_{‖}– stresses in weld according to the figure below:

All values required for check are printed in tables. Ut is the utilization of the most stressed element. Since plastic redistribution of stress in weld is used, it is the decisive utilization. Utc provides information about utilization along the weld length. It is the ratio of actual stress at all elements of the weld to the design resistance of the stress of the whole length of the weld.

The equivalent stress in the weld diagram shows the following stress:

\[ \sigma = \max \left \{ \frac{\sigma_{\perp}}{0.9 \beta_w}, \, \sqrt{\sigma_{\perp}^2 + 3 \tau_{\perp}^2 + 3 \tau_{\parallel}^2} \right \} \]

#### Butt welds

Welds can be specified as butt welds. Complete joint penetration is considered for butt welds, and therefore such welds are not checked.

## Check of bolts and preloaded bolts according to Eurocode

### Bolts

The initial stiffness and design resistance of bolts in shear are in CBFEM modeled according to Cl. 3.6 and 6.3.2 in EN 1993-1-8. The spring representing bearing and tension has a bi-linear force-deformation behavior with an initial stiffness and design resistance according to Cl. 3.6 and 6.3.2 in EN 1993-1-8.

Design tension resistance of bolt (EN 1993-1-8 – Table 3.4):

\[ F_{t,Rd}=0.9 f_{ub} A_s / \gamma_{M2} \]

Design punching shear resistance of bolt head or nut (EN 1993-1-8 – Table 3.4):

\[ B_{p,Rd} = 0.6 \pi d_m t_p f_u / \gamma_{M2} \]

Design shear resistance per one shear plane (EN 1993-1-8 – Table 3.4):

\[ F_{v,Rd} = \alpha_v f_{ub} A_s / \gamma_{M2} \]

Design shear resistance can be multiplied by reduction factor *β*_{p} if packing is present (EN 1993-1-8 – Cl. 3.6.1. (12)) and this option is selected in Code setup.

Design bearing resistance of plate (EN 1993-1-8 – Table 3.4):

\( F_{b,Rd} = k_1 a_b f_u d t / \gamma_{M2} \) for standard holes

\( F_{b,Rd} = 0.6 k_1 a_b f_u d t / \gamma_{M2} \) for slotted holes

Utilization in tension [%]:

\[ Ut_t = \frac{F_{t,Ed}}{\min (F_{t,Rd},\, B_{p,Rd})} \]

Utilization in shear [%]:

\[ Ut_t = \frac{V}{\min (F_{v,Rd},\, F_{b,Rd})} \]

Interaction in shear and tension [%]:

\[ Ut_{ts}=\frac{V}{F_{v,Rd}}+\frac{F_{t,Ed}}{1.4 F_{t,Rd}} \]

where:

*A*_{s}– tensile stress area of the bolt*f*_{ub}– ultimate tensile strength of the bolt*d*_{m}– mean of the across points and across flats dimensions of the bolt head or the nut, whichever is smaller*d*– bolt diameter*t*_{p}– plate thickness under the bolt head/nut*f*_{u}– ultimate steel strength*α*_{v}= 0.6 for grades 4.6, 5.6, 8.8 and 0.5 for grades 4.8, 5.8, 6.8, 10.9- \( k_1 = \min \left (2.8 \frac{e_2}{d_0}-1.7, \, 1.4 \frac{p_2}{d_0}-1.7, \, 2.5 \right ) \) – factor from Table 3.4
*α*_{b}= 1.0 if the bearing check with ab is deactivated in Code setup; if the check is activated, the value of*α*_{b}is determined according to EN 1993-1-8 – Table 3.4: \( \alpha_d = \min \left ( \frac{e_1}{3 d_0}, \, \frac{p_1}{3 d_0}-\frac{1}{4}, \, \frac{f_{ub}}{f_u} \right ) \)*e*_{1},*e*_{2}– edge distances in the direction of the load and perpendicular to the load*p*_{1},*p*_{2}– bolt pitches in the direction of the load and perpendicular to the load*F*_{t,Ed}– design tensile force in bolt*V*– design shear force in bolt*γ*_{M2}– safety factor (EN 1993-1-8 – Table 2.1; editable in Code setup)

Edge distances used for bolt bearing resistance must be relevant for general plate geometries, plates with openings, cutouts, etc.

The algorithm reads the real direction of the resulting shear force vector in a given bolt and then calculates the distances needed for the bearing check.

The end (*e*_{1}) and edge (*e*_{2}) distances are determined by dividing the plate contour into three segments. The end segment is indicated by a 60° range in the direction of the force vector. The edge segments are defined by two 65° ranges perpendicular to the force vector. The shortest distance from a bolt to a relevant segment is then taken as an end, or an edge distance.

The spacing distances between bolt holes (*p*_{1}; *p*_{2}) are determined by virtually enlarging the surrounding bolt holes by a half of their diameter, then drawing two lines in direction and perpendicular to the shear force vector. The distances to the enlarged bolt holes that are intersected by these lines are then considered as *p*_{1} and *p*_{2} in the calculation.

### Preloaded bolts

Design slip resistance per bolt grade 8.8 or 10.9 (EN 1993-1-8, Cl. 3.9 – Equation 3.8):

\[ F_{s,Rd} =\frac{k_s n \mu (F_{p,C} - 0.8 F_{t,Ed})}{\gamma_{M3}} \]

The preload (EN 1993-1-8 – Equation 3.7)

*F*_{p,C} = 0.7 *f*_{ub} *A*_{s}

The preloading force factor 0.7 can be modified in Code setup.

Utilization [%]:

\[ Ut_s = \frac{V}{F_{s,Rd}} \]

where:

*A*_{s}– tensile stress area of the bolt*f*_{ub}– ultimate tensile strength*k*_{s}– a coefficient (EN 1993-1-8 – Table 3.6;*k*_{s}= 1 for normal round holes,*k*_{s}= 0.63 for slotted holes)*μ*– slip factor editable in Code setup (EN 1993-1-8 – Table 3.7)*n*– number of the friction surfaces. Check is calculated for each friction surface separately*γ*_{M3}– safety factor (EN 1993-1-8 – Table 2.1; editable in Code setup – recommended values are 1.25 for ultimate limit state and 1.1 for serviceability limit state design)*V*– design shear force in bolt*F*_{t,Ed}– design tensile force in bolt

If slip of preloaded bolts is checked for serviceability limit state, they should be afterward switched to "bearing – tension/shear interaction" and checked for the ultimate limit state.

### Detailing

Detailing checks of bolts is performed if the option is selected in Code setup. Dimensions from bolt center to plate edges and between bolts is checked. Edge distance *e* = 1.2 and spacing between bolts *p* = 2.2 are recommended in Table 3.3 in EN 1993-1-8. User can modify both values in Code setup.

## Check of anchors according to Eurocode

The anchor bolt resistances are evaluated according to EN 1992-4, Cl. 7.2 for headed and post-installed anchors. Pull-out failure of straight anchors, combined pull-out and concrete failure of bonded anchors, and concrete splitting failure are not checked due to missing information available only for the particular anchor and glue type from the anchor manufacturer.

In the Code setup, settings are available to activate/deactivate concrete cone breakout checks in tension and shear. If the concrete cone breakout check is not activated, it is assumed that the dedicated reinforcement is designed to resist the force. The magnitude of the force is provided in formulas. Furthermore, the concrete can be set as cracked or untracked. The resistances of uncracked concrete are higher.

#### Tensile steel resistance (EN 1992-4, Cl. 7.2.1.3):

\[ N_{Rd,s} = \frac{N_{Rk,s}}{\gamma_{Ms}} \]

where:

*N*_{Rk,s}=*c*∙*A*_{s}∙*f*_{uk}– characteristic resistance of a fastener in case of steel failure*c*– decrease in tensile resistance of bolts with cut thread according to EN 1993-1-8 – Cl. 3.6.1. (3) editable in Code setup*A*_{s}– anchor bolt tensile stress area*f*_{uk}– anchor bolt characteristic ultimate tensile strength- \(\gamma_{Ms}=1.2 \cdot \frac{f_{uk}}{f_{yk}} \ge 1.4\) – partial safety factor for steel failure in tension (EN 1992-4, Table 4.1)
*f*_{yk}– anchor bolt characteristic yield strength

#### Concrete cone failure resistance of anchor or group of anchors (EN 1992-4, Cl. 7.2.1.4):

\[ N_{Rd,c} = \frac{N_{Rk,c}}{\gamma_{Mc}} \]

where:

- \(N_{Rk,c}=N_{Rk,c}^0 \cdot \frac{A_{c,N}}{A_{c,N}^0} \cdot \psi_{s,N} \cdot \psi_{re,N} \cdot \psi_{ec,N} \cdot \psi_{M,N}\) – characteristic resistance of a fastener, a group of fasteners and the tensioned fasteners of a group of fasteners in case of concrete cone failure
- \(N_{Rk,c}^0 = k_1 \sqrt{f_{ck}} h_{ef}^{1.5}\) – characteristic resistance of a single fastener placed in concrete and not influenced by adjacent fasteners or edges of the concrete member
*k*_{1}– factor taking into account concrete condition and anchor type; for cast-in headed anchors (with washer plates)*k*_{1}= 8.9 for cracked concrete and*k*_{1}= 12.7 for non-cracked concrete; for post-installed fasteners (straight anchors)*k*_{1}= 7.7 for cracked concrete and*k*_{1}= 11.0 for non-cracked concrete*f*_{ck }– characteristic concrete compressive cylinder strength*h*_{ef }– embedment depth of the anchor in concrete; for three or more close edges, EN 1992-4, Cl. 7.2.1.4 (8) applies and effective \(h'_{ef} = \max \left \{ \frac{c_{max}}{c_{cr,N}} \cdot h_{ef}, \, \frac{s_{max}}{s_{cr,N}} \cdot h_{ef} \right \}\) is used instead in formulas for*N*_{Rk,c}^{0},*c*_{cr,N},*s*_{cr,N},*A*_{c,N},*A*_{c,N}^{0},*ψ*_{s,N}, and*ψ*_{ec,N}*A*_{c,N}– actual projected area, limited by overlapping concrete cones of adjacent fasteners as well as by edges of the concrete member*A*_{c,N}^{0}=*s*_{cr,N}^{2}– reference projected area, i.e. area of concrete of an individual anchor with large spacing and edge distance at the concrete surface- \(\psi_{s,N}=0.7+0.3 \cdot \frac{c}{c_{cr,N}} \le 1\) – factor taking into account disturbance of the distribution of stresses in the concrete due to the proximity of an edge of the concrete member
*c*– smallest edge distance*c*_{cr,N}= 1.5 ∙*h*_{ef}– characteristic edge distance for ensuring the transmission of the characteristic resistance of an anchor in case of concrete break-out under tension loading- \(\psi_{re,N}=0.5+\frac{h_{ef}}{200} \le 1\) – shell spalling factor
- \(\psi_{ec,N}=\frac{1}{1+2 \cdot (e_N / s_{cr,N})} \le 1\) – factor taking into account group effect when different tension loads are acting on the individual fasteners of a group;
*ψ*_{ec,N}is determined separately for each direction and the product of both factors is used *e*_{N}– eccentricity of resultant tension force of tensioned fasteners in respect to the centre of gravity of the tensioned fasteners*s*_{cr,N}= 2 ∙*c*_{cr,N}– characteristic spacing of anchors to ensure the characteristic resistance of the anchors in case of concrete cone failure under tension load- \(\psi_{M,N} = 2- \frac{z}{1.5 \cdot h_{ef}} \ge 1\) – factor taking into account effect of a compression force between fixture and concrete in cases of bending moments with or without axial force; this parameter is equal to 1 if
*c*< 1.5*h*_{ef}or the ratio of the compressive force (including the compression due to bending) to the sum of tensile forces in anchors is smaller than 0.8 or*z*/*h*_{ef}≥ 1.5 *z*– internal lever arm of a fastening*γ*_{Mc}=*γ*_{c}∙*γ*_{inst }– partial safety factor (EN 1992-4, Table 4.1)*γ*_{c}– partial safety factor for concrete (editable in Code setup)*γ*_{inst}– partial safety factor taking account of the installation safety of an anchor system (editable in Code setup)

The concrete breakout cone area for group of anchors loaded by tension that create common concrete cone, *A*_{c,N}, is shown by red dashed line.

#### Pull-out resistance (EN 1992-4, Cl. 7.2.1.5)

Pull-out resistance is checked for anchors with washer plates according to EN 1992-4, Cl. 7.2.1.5:

\[ N_{Rd,p}=\frac{N_{Rk,p}}{\gamma_{Mc}} \]

where:

*N*_{Rk,p}=*k*_{2}∙*A*_{h}∙*f*_{ck}– characteristic resistance in case of pull-out failure*k*_{2}– coefficient dependent on concrete condition,*k*_{2}= 7.5 for cracked concrete,*k*_{2}= 10.5 for non-cracked concrete*A*_{h}– bearing area of head of anchor; for circular washer plate \(A_h = \frac{\pi}{4} \left ( d_h^2 - d^2 \right )\), for rectangular washer plate \(A_h = a_{wp}^2 - \frac{\pi}{4} d^2\)*d*_{h}≤ 6*t*_{h}+*d*– diameter of the head of the fastener*t*_{h}– thickness of the head of the headed fastener*d*– diameter of the shank of the fastener*f*_{ck}– characteristic concrete compressive cylinder strength*γ*_{Mc}=*γ*_{c}∙*γ*_{inst}– partial safety factor (EN 1992-4, Table 4.1)*γ*_{c}– partial safety factor for concrete (editable in Code setup)*γ*_{inst}– partial safety factor taking account of the installation safety of an anchor system (editable in Code setup)

The pullout resistance of other types of anchors is not checked and must be guaranteed by manufacturer.

#### Concrete blowout resistance (EN 1992-4, Cl. 7.2.1.8)

Blow-out failure is checked for headed anchors (Anchor type – washer) with edge distance *c* ≤ 0.5 *h*_{ef} according to EN 1992-4, Cl. 7.2.1.8. Anchors are treated as a group if their spacing near the edge is *s* ≤ 4 *c*_{1}. Undercut anchors can be checked the same way but the value of *A*_{h} is unknown in the software. The blow-out failure of undercut anchors can be determined by selecting washer plate with the corresponding dimension.

\[N_{Rd,cb} = \frac{N_{Rk,cb}}{\gamma_{Mc}}\]

where:

- \(N_{Rk,cb} = N_{Rk,cb}^0 \cdot \frac{A_{c,Nb}}{A_{c,Nb}^0} \cdot \psi_{s,Nb} \cdot \psi_{g,Nb} \cdot \psi_{ec,Nb}\) – characteristic resistance in case of concrete blow-out failure
- \(N_{Rk,cb}^0 = k_5 \cdot c_1 \cdot \sqrt{A_h} \cdot \sqrt{f_{ck}}\) – characteristic resistance of a single fastener, not influenced by adjacent fasteners or further edges
*A*_{c,Nb}– actual projected area, limited by overlapping concrete break-out bodies of adjacent fasteners as well as by proximity of edges of the concrete member or the member thickness*A*_{c,Nb}^{0}= (4*c*_{1})^{2}– reference projected area of a single fastener with an edge distance equal to*c*_{1}- \(\psi_{s,Nb} = 0.7+0.3 \frac{c_2}{2 c_1} \le 1\) – factor taking into account the disturbance of the distribution of stresses in the concrete due to the proximity of a corner of the concrete member
- \( \psi_{g,Nb} = \sqrt{n} + (1-\sqrt{n}) \frac{s_2}{4c_1} \ge 1 \) – factor taking into account group effect
- \(\psi_{ec,Nb} = \frac{1}{1+2 e_N / s_{cr,Nb}} \le 1\) – factor taking into account group effect, when different loads are acting on the individual fasteners of a group
*k*_{5}– parameter related to the state of the concrete; for cracked concrete*k*_{5}= 8.7, for uncracked concrete*k*_{5}= 12.2*c*_{1}– edge distance of fastener in direction 1 towards the closest edge*c*_{2}– edge distance of fastener perpendicular to direction 1 that is the smallest edge distance in a narrow member with multiple edge distances*A*_{h}– area of the load-bearing head of the fastener; for circular washer plate \(A_h = \frac{\pi}{4} \left ( d_h^2 - d^2 \right )\), for rectangular washer plate \(A_h = a_{wp}^2 - \frac{\pi}{4} d^2\)*d*– anchor nominal diameter*d*_{h}– circular washer plate diameter*a*_{wp}– side size of squared washer plate*f*_{ck}– characteristic compressive cylinder strength of concrete*n*– number of fasteners in a row parallel to the edge of the concrete member*s*_{2}– spacing of fasteners in a group perpendicular to direction 1*s*_{cr,Nb}= 4*c*_{1}– spacing that is required for a fastener to develop its characteristic tensile strength against blow-out failure

#### Anchor shear steel resistance (EN 1992-4 – Cl. 7.2.2.3)

Anchor shear steel resistance is checked according to EN 1992-4 – Cl. 7.2.2.3. Friction is not taken into account. Shear with and without lever arm is recognized in dependence on base plate manufacturing operation settings.

\[V_{Rd,s} = \frac{V_{Rk,s}}{\gamma_{Ms}}\]

For stand-off: direct, the **shear without lever arm** is assumed (EN 1992-4 – Cl. 7.2.2.3.1):

*V*_{Rk,s} = *k*_{6} ∙ *A*_{s} ∙ *f*_{uk} – characteristic resistance of a single fastener in case of steel failure; or fasteners with a ratio *h*_{ef} / *d*_{nom} < 5 and a concrete compressive strength class < C20/25 the characteristic resistance *V*_{Rk,s} should be multiplied by a factor of 0.8.

For stand-off: mortar joint, the **shear with lever arm** is assumed (EN 1992-4 – Cl. 7.2.2.3.2):

\[V_{Rk,s}= \frac{\alpha_M \cdot M_{Rk,s}}{l_a}\]

where:

*k*_{6}= 0.6 for anchors with fuk ≤ 500 MPa;*k*_{6}= 0.5 otherwise*A*_{s}– shear area of anchor; if shear plane in thread is selected, the area reduced by threads is used; otherwise, full shank area is used*f*_{uk}– anchor bolt ultimate strength*α*_{M}= 2 – full restraint is assumed (EN 1992-4 – Cl. 6.2.2.3)- \( M_{Rk,s} = M_{Rk,s}^0 \left ( 1 - \frac{N_{Ed}}{N_{Rd,s}} \right ) \) – characteristic bending resistance of the anchor decreased by the tensile force in the anchor
*M*_{Rk,s}^{0}= 1.2*W*_{el}*f*_{ub }– characteristic bending resistance of the anchor (ETAG 001, Annex C – Equation (5.5b))- \( W_{el} = \frac{\pi d^3}{32}\) – section modulus of the anchor
*d*– anchor bolt diameter; if shear plane in thread is selected, the diameter reduced by threads is used; otherwise, nominal diameter,*d*_{nom}, is used*N*_{Ed}– tensile force in the anchor*N*_{Rd,s}– tensile resistance of the anchor*l*_{a}= 0.5*d*_{nom}+*t*_{mortar}+ 0.5*t*_{bp}– lever arm*t*_{mortar}– thickness of mortar (grout)*t*_{bp}– thickness of the base plate*γ*_{Ms}= 1.0 ∙*f*_{uk}/*f*_{yk}≥ 1.25 for*f*_{uk}≤ 800 MPa and*f*_{yk}/*f*_{uk}≤ 0.8;*γ*_{Ms }= 1.5 otherwise – partial safety factor for steel failure (EN 1992-4 – Table 4.1)

#### Concrete pry-out failure (EN 1992-4 – Cl. 7.2.2.4):

\[ V_{Rd,cp}= \frac{V_{Rk,cp}}{\gamma_{Mc}} \]

where:

*V*_{Rk,cp}=*k*_{8}∙*N*_{Rk,c}– characteristic resistance of concrete pry-out failure*k*_{8}= 1 for*h*_{ef}< 60 mm;*k*_{8}= 2 for*h*_{ef}≥ 60 mm (ETAG 001, Annex C – Cl. 5.2.3.3)*N*_{Rk,c}– characteristic resistance of a fastener, a group of fasteners and the tensioned fasteners of a group of fasteners in case of concrete cone failure; all anchors are assumed to be in tension*γ*_{Mc}=*γ*_{c}– partial safety factor (EN 1992-4 – Table 4.1,*γ*_{inst}= 1.0 for shear loading)*γ*_{c}– partial safety factor for concrete (editable in Code setup)

#### Concrete edge failure (EN 1992-4 – Cl. 7.2.2.5):

Concrete edge failure is a brittle failure and the worst possible case is checked, i.e. only the anchors located near the edge transfer the full shear load acting on a whole base plate. If anchors are positioned in a rectangular pattern, the row of anchors at the investigated edge transfers the shear load. If anchors are positioned irregularly, the two anchors nearest to the investigated edge transfer the shear load. Two edges in the direction of the shear load are investigated and the worst case is shown in results.

*Investigated edges in dependence on the direction of the shear force resultant*

\[ V_{Rd,c} = \frac{V_{Rk,c}}{\gamma_{Mc}} \]

where:

- \( V_{Rk,c}= V_{Rk,c}^0 \cdot \frac{A_{c,V}}{A_{c,V}^0} \cdot \psi_{s,V} \cdot \psi_{h,V} \cdot \psi_{ec,V} \cdot \psi_{\alpha,V} \cdot \psi_{re,V} \) – characteristic resistance of a fastener or a group of fasteners loaded towards the edge
- \( V_{Rk,c}^0 = k_9 \cdot d_{nom}^\alpha \cdot l_f^\beta \cdot f_{ck}^{0.5} \cdot c_1^{1.5}\) – initial value of the characteristic resistance of a fastener loaded perpendicular to the edge
*k*_{9}– factor taking into account concrete condition;*k*_{9}= 1.7 for cracked concrete,*k*_{9}= 2.4 for non-cracked concrete- \( \alpha = 0.1 \left ( \frac{l_f}{c_1} \right ) ^{0.5} \)
- \( \beta = 0.1 \left ( \frac{d_{nom}}{c_1} \right ) ^{0.2} \)
*l*_{f}= min (*h*_{ef}, 12*d*_{nom}) for*d*_{nom}≤ 24 mm;*l*_{f}= min [*h*_{ef}, max (8*d*_{nom}, 300 mm)] for*d*_{nom}> 24 mm – effective length of the anchor in shear*h*_{ef}– embedment depth of the anchor in concrete*c*_{1}– distance from the anchor to the investigated edge; for fastenings in a narrow, thin member, the effective distance \( c'_1=\max \left \{ \frac{c_{2,max}}{1.5}, \, \frac{h}{1.5}, \, \frac{s_{2,max}}{3} \right \} \) is used instead*c*_{2}– smaller distance to the concrete edge perpendicular to the distance*c*_{1}*d*_{nom}– nominal anchor diameter*A*_{c,V}^{0}= 4.5*c*_{1}^{2}– area of concrete cone of an individual anchor at the lateral concrete surface not affected by edges*A*_{c,V}– actual area of the concrete cone of anchorage at the lateral concrete surface- \(\psi_{s,V} = 0.7+0.3 \frac{c_2}{1.5 c_1} \le 1.0 \) – factor which takes account of the disturbance of the distribution of stresses in the concrete due to further edges of the concrete member on the shear resistance
- \( \psi_{h,V} = \left ( \frac{1.5 c_1}{h} \right ) ^ {0.5} \le 1.0 \) – factor which takes account of the fact that the shear resistance does not decrease proportionally to the member thickness as assumed by the ratio
*A*_{c,V}/*A*_{c,V}^{0} - \( \psi_{ec,V} = \frac{1}{1+2 e_V / (3c_1)} \le 1 \) – factor which takes account of a group effect when different shear loads are acting on the individual anchors of a group
- \( \psi_{\alpha,V} = \sqrt{\frac{1}{(\cos \alpha_V)^2 + (0.5 \sin \alpha_V)^2}} \ge 1 \) – takes account of the angle
*α*_{V}between the load applied,*V*, and the direction perpendicular to the free edge of the concrete member *ψ*_{re,V}= 1.0 – factor takes account of the effect of the type of reinforcement used in cracked concrete*h*– concrete block height*γ*_{Mc}=*γ*_{c}– partial safety factor (EN 1992-4 – Table 4.1,*γ*_{inst}= 1.0 for shear loading)*γ*_{c}– partial safety factor for concrete (editable in Code setup)

### Anchors with stand-off

Anchor with stand-off is designed as a bar element loaded by shear force, bending moment and compressive or tensile force. These internal forces are determined by finite element model. The anchor is fixed on both sides, one side is 0.5×*d* below the concrete level, the other side is in the middle of the thickness of the plate. The buckling length is conservatively assumed as twice the length of the bar element. Plastic section modulus is used. The bar element is designed according to EN 1993-1-1. The shear force may decrease the yield strength of the steel according to Cl. 6.2.8 but the minimum length of the anchor to fit the nut under the base plate ensures that the anchor fails in bending before the shear force reaches half the shear resistance. The reduction is therefore not necessary. Interaction of bending moment and compressive or tensile strength is assessed according to Cl. 6.2.1.

#### Shear resistance (EN 1993-1-1 Cl. 6.2.6):

\[ V_{pl,Rd} = \frac{A_V f_y / \sqrt{3}}{\gamma_{M2}} \]

where:

*A*_{V}= 0.844*A*_{s}– shear area*A*_{s}– bolt area reduced by threads*f*_{y}– bolt yield strength*γ*_{M2}– partial safety factor

#### Tensile resistance (EN 1993-1-8 – Cl. 3.6.1):

\[ F_{t,Rd}=\frac{c k_2 f_{ub} A_s}{\gamma_{M2}} \ge F_t \]

where:

*c*– decrease in tensile resistance of bolts with cut thread according to EN 1993-1-8 – Cl. 3.6.1. (3) editable in Code setup*k*_{2}= 0.9 – factor from Table 3.4 in EN 1993-1-8*f*_{ub}– anchor bolt ultimate strength*A*_{s}– anchor bolt tensile stress area*γ*_{M2}– safety factor (EN 1993-1-8 – Table 2.1; editable in Code setup)

#### Compressive resistance (EN 1993-1-1 Cl. 6.3):

\[ F_{c,Rd} = \frac{\chi A_s f_y}{\gamma_{M2}} \]

where:

- \( \chi = \frac{1}{\Phi + \sqrt{\Phi^2 - \bar\lambda^2}} \le 1 \) – buckling reduction factor
- \( \Phi = 0.5 \left [1+ \alpha (\bar\lambda - 0.2) + \bar\lambda^2 \right ] \) – value to determine buckling reduction factor
*χ* *α*= 0.49 – imperfection factor for buckling curve c (belonging to the full circle)- \( \bar\lambda = \sqrt{\frac{A_s f_y}{N_{cr}}} \) – relative slenderness
- \( N_{cr} = \frac{\pi^2 E I}{L_{cr}^2} \) – Euler's critical force
- \( I = \frac{\pi d_s^4}{64} \) – moment of inertia of the bolt
*L*_{cr}= 2*l*– buckling length; it is assumed on a safe side that the bolt is fixed in the concrete and able to freely rotate at the base plate*l*– length of the bolt element equal to half the base plate thickness + gap + half the bolt diameter; it is assumed on a safe side that the washer and a nut are not clamped to the concrete surface (ETAG 001 – Annex C – Cl. 4.2.2.4)

#### Bending resistance (EN 1993-1-1 Cl. 6.2.5):

\[ M_{pl,Rd} = \frac{W_{pl} f_y}{\gamma_{M2}} \]

- \( W_{pl}= \frac{d_s^3}{6} \) – section modulus of the bolt
*f*_{y}– bolt yield strength*γ*_{M2}– partial safety factor

#### Anchor steel utilization (EN 1993-1-1 Cl. 6.2.1)

\[ \frac{N_{Ed}}{N_{Rd}} + \frac{M_{Ed}}{M_{Rd}} \le 1 \]

where:

*N*_{Ed}– tensile (positive) or compressive (negative sign) design force*N*_{Rd}– tensile (positive,*F*_{t,Rd}) or compressive (negative sign,*F*_{c,Rd}) design resistance*M*_{Ed}– design bending moment*M*_{Rd}=*M*_{pl,Rd}– design bending resistance

## Check of concrete block according to Eurocode

Concrete below the base plate is simulated by the Winkler subsoil with uniform stiffness, which provides the contact stresses. The average stress at the effective area determined by EN 1993-1-8 is used for compressive check.

The resistance of concrete in 3D compression is determined based on EN 1993-1-8 by calculating the design bearing strength of concrete in the joint, *f*_{jd}, under the effective area, *A*_{eff}, of the base plate. The design bearing strength of the joint, *f*_{jd}, is evaluated according to Cl. 6.2.5 in EN 1993-1-8 and Cl. 6.7 in EN 1992-1-1. The grout quality and thickness is introduced by the joint coefficient, *β*_{jd}. For grout quality equal or better than the quality of the concrete block, *β*_{jd} = 1.0 is expected, EN 1993-1-8 recommends value *β*_{jd} = 0.67. The effective area, *A*_{eff,cm} under the base plate is estimated to be of the shape of the column cross-section increased by additional bearing width, *c*.

\[ c = t \sqrt{\frac{f_y}{3 f_{jd} \gamma_{M0}}} \]

where *t* is the thickness of the base plate, *f*_{y} is the base plate yield strength, and *γ*_{M0} is the partial safety factor for steel.

The effective area is calculated by iteration until the difference between the additional bearing widths of current and previous iteration |*c*_{i} – *c*_{i–1} | is less than 1 mm. For the first iteration, the area of the base plate is assumed as a bearing area, *A*_{c0}.

The area where the concrete is in compression is taken from results of FEA. This area in compression, *A*_{eff,FEM}, allows determining the position of the neutral axis. The user can modify this area by editing “Effective area – influence of mesh size” in Code setup. The default value is 0.1 for which the verification studies were made. It is not recommended to decrease this value. Increasing this value makes the assessment of concrete bearing resistance safer. The value in Code setup determines the boundary of the area, *A*_{eff,FEM}, e.g. the value of 0.1 takes into account only areas where stress in concrete is higher than 0.1 times the maximum stress in concrete, *σ*_{c,max}. The intersection of the area in compression, *A*_{eff,FEM}, and the effective area, *A*_{eff,cm}, allows to assess the resistance for generally loaded column base of any column shape with any stiffeners and is labeled *A*_{eff}. The average stress *σ* on the effective area, *A*_{eff}, is determined as the compression force divided by the effective area. Check of the component is in stresses *σ* ≤ *f*_{jd}.

Concrete resistance at concentrated compression:

\[ f_{jd}= \beta_j k_j \frac{f_{ck}}{\gamma_c} \]

Concentration factor taking into account increase in concrete compressive resistance due to triaxial stress:

\[ k_j=\sqrt{\frac{A_{c1}}{A_{eff}}} \le 3.0 \]

where *A*_{c1} is the supporting area determined according to EN 1992-1-1 – Cl. 6.7. The area must be concentric and geometrically similar to the bearing area *A*_{eff}.

Average stress under the base plate:

\[ \sigma = \frac{N}{A_{eff}} \]

Utilization in compression [%]:

\[ Ut = \frac{\sigma}{f_{jd}} \]

where:

*f*_{ck}– characteristic compressive concrete strength*β*_{j}= 0.67 – factor of grout quality editable in Code setup*γ*_{c}– safety factor for concrete*A*_{eff}– effective area on which the column normal force*N*is distributed

Effective area, *A*_{eff,cm}, as calculated according to EC for pure compression is marked with a dashed line. The graphical representation shows the way of checking. Calculated effective area, *A*_{eff,fem}, is marked as green. Final effective area, *A*_{eff}, for contact stress check is highlighted as hatched.

For rare occasions, especially for column base loaded by tensile force only (compression in concrete is caused by prying forces) or tensile force and bending moment, the intersection of areas *A*_{eff,cm} and *A*_{eff,fem} is extremely small or none at all. For such cases, the compressive forces are generally very small, the check is outside of the scope of Eurocode and the concrete in compression is not checked.

#### Mesh sensitivity

This procedure of assessing the resistance of the concrete in compression is independent on the mesh of the base plate as can be seen in the figures below. It is shown in the example of concrete in compression assessment according to EC. Two cases were investigated: loading by pure compression of 1200 kN and loading by a combination of compressive force 1200 kN and bending moment 90 kN.

Influence of number of elements on prediction of resistance of concrete in compression in case of pure compression

The influence of number of elements on prediction of resistance of concrete in compression in case of compression and bending

### Shear in concrete block

Shear in concrete block can be transferred via one of the three means:

- Friction

\( Ut = \frac{V}{V_{Rd}} \)

*V*_{rd}=*N**C*_{f}

- Shear lug

\( Ut = \max \left ( \frac{V_y}{V_{Rd,y}}, \, \frac{V_z}{V_{Rd,z}}, \, \frac{V}{V_{c,Rd}} \right ) \) \(V_{Rd,y} = \frac{A_{Vy} f_y}{\sqrt{3} \gamma_{M0}} \)

\( V_{Rd,z} = \frac{A_{Vz} f_y}{\sqrt{3} \gamma_{M0}} \)

\( V_{c,Rd} = A \sigma_{Rd,max} \)

Shear iron and welds are also checked by FEM.

- Anchors

Check is provided according to ETAG 001 – Annex C

where:

*A*_{V,},_{y}*A*_{V,}– shear areas of shear iron cross-section in the direction of axes_{z}*y*and*z**f*_{y}– yield strength*γ*_{M0}– safety factor*V*– shear force component in the base plate plane in y-direction_{y}*V*– shear force component in the base plate plane in z-direction_{z}*V*– shear force (vector sum of both shear forces components)*N*– force perpendicular to the base plate*C*_{f}– friction coefficient between steel and concrete/grout; editable in Code setup*A*=*l b*– projected area of the shear lug excluding the portion above concrete surface*l*– length of the shear lug excluding the portion above concrete surface*b*– projected width of the shear lug in the direction of the shear load*σ*_{Rd,max}=*k*_{1}*v'**f*_{cd}– maximum stress which can be applied at the edges of the node*k*_{1}= 1 – factor (EN 1992-1-1 – Equation (6.60))*v'*= 1 –*f*_{ck}/ 250– factor (EN 1992-1-1 – Equation (6.57N))- \( f_{cd} = \alpha_{cc} \frac{f_{ck}} {\gamma_c} \) – design compressive strength of concrete
*α*_{cc}– coefficient for long term effects on compressive strength of concrete*f*_{ck}– characteristic compressive strength of concrete*γ*_{c}– safety factor for concrete

## Capacity design according to Eurocode

Capacity design is a part of a seismic check and ensures that the joint has sufficient deformation capacity.

The objective of capacity design is to confirm a building undergoes controlled ductile behavior in order to avoid collapse in a design-level earthquake. Plastic hinge is expected to appear in dissipative item and all non-dissipative items of the joint must be able to safely transfer forces due to the yielding in the dissipative item. The dissipative item is usually a beam in moment resisting frame but it may also be e.g. an end plate. The safety factor is not used for dissipative items. Two factors are assigned to the dissipative item:

*γ*_{ov}– overstrength factor – EN 1998-1, Cl. 6.2; the recommended value is*γ*_{ov}= 1.25; editable in materials*γ*_{sh}– strain-hardening factor; the recommended values are*γ*_{sh}= 1.2 for beam in moment resisting frame,*γ*_{sh}= 1.0 otherwise; editable in operation

The material diagram is modified according to the following figure:

The increased strength of the dissipative item allows for the input of loads that cause the plastic hinge to appear in dissipative item. In the case of moment resisting frame and beam as the dissipative item, the beam should be loaded by *M*_{y}_{,Ed} = *γ*_{ov}*γ*_{sh}*f*_{y}*W*_{pl,}* _{y}* and corresponding shear force

*V*

_{z}_{,Ed}= –2

*M*

_{y}_{,Ed}/

*L*

_{h}, where:

*f*_{y}– characteristic yield strength*W*_{pl,}– plastic section modulus_{y}*L*_{h}– distance between plastic hinges on the beam

In the case of an asymmetric joint, the beam should be loaded by both sagging and hogging bending moments and their corresponding shear forces.

The plates of dissipative items are excluded from the check.

## Buckling analysis according to Eurocode

The load resistance of slender components may be determined by a combination of linear buckling analysis and materially nonlinear analysis.

There are five categories of finite element structural analysis with following assumptions:

- Linear material, geometrically linear
- Nonlinear material, geometrically linear
- Linear material, linear loss of stability – buckling
- Linear material, geometrically nonlinear using imperfections
- Nonlinear material, geometrically nonlinear using imperfections

A design procedure which combines approaches 2 and 3 – material nonlinearity and stability analysis – is mentioned in Chapter 8 of EN 1993-1-6. The verification of buckling resistance based on the obtained FEM results is described in Annex B of EN 1993-1-5. This procedure is used for wide range of structures except for very slender shells, where geometrically nonlinear analysis with initial imperfections is more suitable (4 and 5).

The procedure uses load amplifiers *α* which are obtained as the results of FEM analysis and allows to predict the post-buckling resistance of the joints.

The load coefficient, *α*_{ult,k}, is determined by reaching the plastic capacity without considering the geometrical nonlinearity. The check of plastic capacity and the general automatic determination of *α*_{ult,k} is implemented into the developed software.

The critical buckling factor, *α*_{cr}, is determined, which is obtained using FEM analysis of linear stability. It is determined automatically in the software using the same FEM model as for calculation of *α*_{ult,k}. It should be noted that the critical point in terms of the plastic resistance is not necessarily assessed in the first critical buckling mode. More buckling modes need to be assessed in a complex joint because they are related to different parts of the joint.

The non-dimensional plate slenderness, \( \bar \lambda_p \), of the examined buckling mode is determined:

\[ \bar \lambda_p = \sqrt{\frac{\alpha_{ult,k}}{\alpha_{cr}}} \]

The reduction buckling factor *ρ* is determined according to Annex B of EN 1993-1-5. The reduction factor depends on the plate slenderness. The used buckling curve shows the influence of reduction factor on the plate slenderness. The provided buckling factor applicable to non-uniform members is based on the buckling curves of a beam. The verification is based on the von Mises yield criterion and the reduced stress method. Buckling resistance is assessed as

\[ \frac{\alpha_{ult,k} \rho}{\gamma_{M2}} \ge 1 \]

*Buckling reduction factor ρ according to EN 1993-1-5 Annex B*

Although the process seems trivial, it is general, robust and easily automated. The advantage of the procedure is the advanced FEM analysis of the whole joint which can be applied to general geometry. Moreover, it is included in the valid Eurocode standards. The advanced numerical analysis gives a quick overview of the global behaviour of the structure and its critical parts and allows fast stiffening to prevent instabilities.

The limit slenderness, *λ*_{p}, is provided in Annex B of EN 1993-1-5 and sets all cases which must be assessed according to the previous procedure. The resistance is limited by buckling for plate slenderness higher than 0.7. With the decreasing slenderness, the resistance is governed by plastic strain. The limit critical buckling factor for plate slenderness equals to 0.7 and buckling resistance equals to the plastic resistance may be obtained as follows

\[ \alpha_{cr} = \frac{\alpha_{ult,k}}{\bar \lambda_p^2} = \frac{1}{0.7^2} = 2.04 \]

The influence of the plate slenderness on the plastic resistance, *M*_{ult,k}, and buckling resistance, *M*_{CBFEM}, is shown in the figure bellow. The diagram shows the results of a numerical study of a triangular stiffener in a portal frame joint.

*The influence of plate slenderness on the resistance of portal frame joint with slender stiffener*

## Joint classification (EN)

Joints are classified according to joint stiffness to:

- Rigid – joints with insignificant change of original angles between members,
- Semirigid – joints which are assumed to have the capacity to furnish a dependable and known degree of flexural restraint,
- Pinned – joints which do not develop bending moments.

Joints are classified according to the EN 1993-1-8 – Cl. 5.2.2.

- Rigid – \( \frac{S_{j,ini} L_b}{E I_b} \ge k_b \)
- Semirigid – \( 0.5 < \frac{S_{j,ini} L_b}{E I_b} < k_b \)
- Pinned – \( \frac{S_{j,ini} L_b}{E I_b} \le 0.5 \)

where:

*S*_{j,ini}– initial stiffness of the joint; the joint stiffness is assumed linear up to the 2/3 of*M*_{j,Rd}*L*_{b}– theoretical length of the analyzed member; set in member properties*E*– Young's modulus of elasticity*I*_{b}– moment of inertia of the analyzed member*k*_{b}= 8 for frames where the bracing system reduces the horizontal displacement by at least 80 %;*k*_{b}= 25 for other frames, provided that in every storey*K*_{b}/*K*_{c}≥ 0.1. The value of*k*_{b}= 25 is used unless the user sets "braced system" in Code setup.*M*_{j,Rd}– joint design moment resistance*K*_{b}=*I*_{b}/*L*_{b}*K*_{c}=*I*_{c}/*L*_{c}