Capacity design according to SP

This article is also available in:

Capacity design is using the same procedure as in EC due to missing prescriptions in Russian codes.

The objective of capacity design is to confirm a building undergoes controlled ductile behaviour in order to avoid collapse in a design-level earthquake. Plastic hinge is expected to appear in dissipative item and all non-dissipative items of the joint must be able to safely transfer forces due to the yielding in the dissipative item. The dissipative item is usually a beam in moment resisting frame but it may also be e.g. an end plate. The service factor is not used for dissipative items. Two factors are assigned to the dissipative item:

  • γov – overstrength factor – EN 1998-1, Cl. 6.2; the recommended value is γov = 1.25; editable in materials
  • γsh – strain-hardening factor; the recommended values are γsh = 1.2 for beam in moment resisting frame, γsh = 1.0 otherwise; editable in operation

The material diagram is modified according to the following figure:

The increased strength of the dissipative item allows for the input of loads that cause the plastic hinge to appear in dissipative item. In the case of moment resisting frame and beam as the dissipative item, the beam should be loaded by My,Ed = γovγshfyWpl,y and corresponding shear forceVz,Ed = –2 My,Ed / Lh, where:

  • fy – characteristic yield strength
  • Wpl,y – plastic section modulus
  • Lh – distance between plastic hinges on the beam

In case of asymmetric joint, the beam should be loaded by both sagging and hogging bending moments and their corresponding shear forces.

The plates of dissipative items are excluded from check.

Related articles

Check of components according to SP (Russian standards)

Check of concrete block according to SP

Detailing of bolts and welds and anchors according to SP

Joint classification according to SP

Check of welds according to SP

Check of bolts and preloaded bolts according to SP

Design check of plates according to SP