Top image background picture

Reinforced Concrete Members with Discontinuities

Ohio State University research confirms the Compatible Stress Field Method to validate reinforced concrete design, where traditional methods such as the Strut-and-Tie Model fall short.

Verification project

  • Four concrete members with discontinuities were created and examined against baseline calculations and experimental data.
  • Design checks were performed according to ACI 318-19 and AASHTO LRFD
  • Compatible Stress Field Method (CSFM) results compared with traditional strut and tie methods (STM) as well as the FEA approach (ABAQUS).
  • Verification studies provide a comprehensive understanding of the behavior of reinforced concrete members with discontinuities
  • All results correlate very well with ACI, with minor differences under 10% of the experimental data
Go through all verifications
image block

Deep Beam

  • 5 reinforced concrete deep beam specimens investigated
  • Comparing the strength and deformation capacities resulting from CSFM with strut and tie methods (STM) defined by ACI 318-05 and ACI 318-19
  • Load deflection, principal stress distribution and crack patterns examined against ABAQUS
Read the verification study for Deep Beam
image block

Walking Column

  • Investigating 4 specimens of a walking column
  • Assessment of CSFM vertical load capacities compared with design capacities from the STM
  • Load-bearing capacity, principal stress distribution, and crack patterns were determined and compared using the CSFM and ACI 318-19 design procedures. 
Read the verification study for Walking Column
image block

Shear Walls with Openings

  • 4 specimens of shear walls with openings were examined
  • Evaluating load capacity and drift angle compared to experimental data
  • Calculate design capacities with the Strut and Tie model
  • Comparative analysis with ABAQUS on principal stress distribution, drift angle and crack patterns
Read the verification study for Shear Wall
image block

Corbel

  • 7 reinforced concrete corbel specimens investigated
  • Comparing CSFM with design capacities using the ACI-318-19 and AASHTO LRFD
  • Testing deflection, principal stress distribution, and crack patterns against ABAQUS models
  • Exploring the influence of secondary reinforcement on corbel capacities
Read the verification study for Corbel
image block
cta trial image
TRY IDEA STATICA FOR FREE
  • Experience all features, the User Portal, and workflows
  • Receive support from our product engineers
  • Learn through training and free tutorials